Galanis, Pollack, Jacobs & Johnson, S.C.

Galanis, Pollack, Jacobs & Johnson, S.C.

BUSINESS LAWYERS FOCUSED ON RESULTS

414-271-5400

Pay Online

  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Joshua J. Brady
    • Aaron D. Plamann
    • Michael J. Rosolino
    • Michael Edwards
    • Zachary L. Enstrom
    • Jonathan Wild
  • Practice Areas
    • Creditor Bankruptcy Rights, Insolvency + Liquidation
    • Corporate + Business Organization
    • Debt Collection
    • Replevin
    • Repossession Law + Lienholders Rights – Wisconsin
    • Repossession Law + Lienholders Rights – Illinois
    • Motor Vehicle Dealership Representation
    • Contract and Loan Document Drafting
    • Civil Litigation + Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Subrogation
    • Real Estate
    • Construction
    • Local Counsel
    • Asset Protection + Long-Term Care Planning
    • Family Law
  • Blog
  • Contact

Burton v. Kohn Law Firm

Posted Aug 28, 2019

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit recently affirmed a ruling granting summary judgment in favor of a WI law firm. John H. Burton had sued Kohn Law Firm in federal court alleging that his rights under the FDCPA and WCA had been violated. Previously, Kohn, on behalf of Unifund CCR, had filed a lawsuit in WI circuit court against Burton. Unifund is a debt collection agency that was seeking to a collect a debt on a credit card account under the name of John H. Burton. The circuit court case was dismissed after Burton claimed that he was not the account holder and was the victim of identity theft. In the federal lawsuit, Burton specifically alleged Kohn was in violation of the FDCPA and WCA for failing to provide him with a right to cure the default. The notice provisions are applicable to debt collection of “consumer” debts incurred for “personal, family, or household purposes.” The 7th Circuit affirmed in favor of Kohn, based on Burton not having sufficient evidence to show the debt was a consumer debt. The Court reasoned, because Burton argued the debt was not his in state court, his assertion that it was a consumer debt in the federal case could not be reconciled.

Debt Collection

Recent Posts

  • GPJJ Announces Attorney Admission
  • Wisconsin Court of Appeals Clarifies the Necessary Elements of Wisconsin Products Liability Design Defect Cases
  • Malfunctioning Products: Circumstantial Evidence in a Material World
  • Returning to Work and the Reluctant Employee
  • Wisconsin Governor Evers Issues Statewide Mask Mandate

Categories

  • Creditor Bankruptcy Rights
  • Debt Collection
  • Estate Planning
  • Labor and Employment Law
  • News
  • Replevin Law
  • Subrogation

413 N. Second Street
Suite 150
Milwaukee, WI 53203

gpjlaw@gpjlaw.com

(414) 271-5400 phone
(414) 271-5571 fax

  • LinkedIn
  • Practice Areas
    • Creditor Bankruptcy Rights, Insolvency + Liquidation
    • Corporate + Business Organization
    • Debt Collection
    • Replevin
    • Repossession Law + Lienholders Rights – Wisconsin
    • Repossession Law + Lienholders Rights – Illinois
    • Motor Vehicle Dealership Representation
    • Contract and Loan Document Drafting
    • Civil Litigation + Alternative Dispute Resolution
    • Subrogation
    • Real Estate
    • Construction
    • Local Counsel
    • Asset Protection + Long Term Care Planning
  • About Us
    • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Testimonials
    • Blog
    • Contact

2026 Galanis, Pollack, Jacobs & Johnson, S.C. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy.